Moovie 影牛
按内容相似度排序，推荐理由根据共同类型与主创信息生成。
影片的第一个镜头是几个充气的气囊；接着是穿着短裙的芭蕾舞女演员，然后是歌剧院广场的前景和拳击手挥舞剧院的动作。歌剧院广场，一个达达派艺术家在沉思，要烧掉歌剧院。于是，火柴划着了。拳击手挥起双拳再一次向大歌剧院打去。庙宇的立柱。在高楼的平顶上，达达派艺术家曼·雷伊和画家杜尚正在下棋。突然，喷射而来的水搅乱了棋局。女舞蹈演员的舞步。女人的脸和水母的眼。一颗鸟蛋在喷泉吐出的水柱中蹦跳。芭蕾舞团的主要演员扮成罗尔猎人出现在屋顶上。他瞄准鸟蛋。蛋仿佛在水柱中起舞。开枪。蛋壳破裂。一只白鸽破壳而出。达达派画家端着猎枪。瞄准、射击，猎人应声跌落。一辆由骆驼拖曳的灵车载着死者的棺木，缓缓驶在巴黎的郊区大路上。灵柩上放着饼干花环，送葬者挂着哀恸的神情。灵车越走越快，终于狂奔起来。跟在车后的绅士、太太们疯狂追赶。最后，灵车撞到墙上，棺木掀翻，死者穿着魔术师的装束，从棺木里爬出。他挥动魔杖。追来的人群立即消失，他又点了一下自己的胸口，他也倏忽同隐去。
查看详情 ›
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
哈瑞（杰瑞德·莱托 Jared Leto 饰）和玛丽安（詹妮弗·康纳利 Jennifer Connelly 饰）彼此相爱，梦想着开个服装店，梦想着有个美好的明天。然而他们都离不开毒品，并想着以销毒赚得第一桶金。哈瑞的母亲是个彻底的电视迷，最大的梦想是上电视，为此不顾年迈吞食减肥药。由于药品里的毒品成分，她渐渐上了瘾。哈瑞的朋友狄龙（马龙·韦恩斯 Marlon Wayans 饰）同样是个瘾君子，为了挣大钱加入了黑社会。为了梦想，他们努力着，却一步步深陷毒品难以自拔。 哈瑞的胳膊因注射毒品感染而被割去；玛丽安为了毒品出卖肉体和自尊；哈瑞的母亲最终住进了精神病院受尽折磨；狄龙锒铛入狱。当视线变得模糊，梦在遥远处呼唤，迷失的人该以怎样的姿态安抚自己的灵魂。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
弗里达（salma hayek 饰）是墨西哥著名的女画家，18岁之前她是一个快乐活泼的少女，跟其他人一样，享受着爱情的甜蜜。然而18岁的车祸让她遭遇重创，死里逃生的她从此跟病痛伴随一生。原来的小情人也离她而去。躺在病床18个月的她整日与画为伴，她的画充满了不可思议的活力与激情。那时候她也真正开始考虑卖画养活自己，她前去请求画家里维拉指导自己的画，对方激赏她的天分。他们也从师生转变成一生的伴侣，他们结婚了。婚后他们经历了墨西哥最动荡的革命时期，他们狂热地追随着共产主义的脚步，甚至当托洛斯基被斯大林逐出苏联后，他们不畏风险地予以热情接待。弗里达与托洛斯基朦胧的爱恋，以及她的女同性恋情结让她的感情史一样绚烂。 1954年，弗里达离开了这个充满了病痛的世界，但愿离去是幸。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
本片以1971年美国的“斯坦福监狱实验”为基础，根据马里奥•乔丹努的小说《黑盒子》改编。出租司机塔瑞克•法德（莫里兹•布雷多Moritz Bleibtreu 饰）看到报纸上一个征招心理实验对象的广告前去应聘，与其他19名各行各业各年龄段的男性应聘者被分为两组，本别扮演十二名囚犯和八名狱警，实施为时2周的模拟监狱实验，并各获4000德国马克报酬。实验前夕，塔瑞克回到自己两年前曾供职的报社，决定将实验过程中发生的情形写成报道出售。塔瑞克在实验中是囚犯77号，他依仗着实验中不准使用暴力的规定，故意挑起事端制造新闻。狱警博鲁斯（贾斯特斯•冯•多纳伊Justus von Dohnanyi 饰）不满塔瑞克的嚣张，在对囚犯的制裁中一步步确立自己的权威。二人的针锋相对为实验带来了不可预计的后果…… 本片获德国电影奖年度电影及三项年度突出表现金奖——最佳男主角（莫里兹•布雷多）、场景设计及最佳男配角（贾斯特斯•冯•多纳伊）。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
自称闷蛋的女记者要访问达利，大师扭扭拧拧一次两次都做不成，他遥不可及，在超现实里、在画内画外、在别人梦中、在电影技巧里。不让昆丹杜皮埃玩荒谬开放叙事他会周身唔聚财，已玩过搞笑超级英雄救地球（《鬼鼠鼠咳烟战队》），今回借着达利正式宣布自己是布纽尔首徒：《灭绝天使》的框中框、《中产阶级拘谨的魅力》的梦中梦、《模糊情欲对象》不同演员演同一角色；把弄招牌二撇鸡，扭曲挂表滴滴答答，时空无始无终尽情回环，眼花撩乱赏心悦目。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
Brussels. Leo, a Spanish metro driver, while conducting his train and arriving at a station, sees a young man in distress on the edge of the platform. He recognizes his son Hugo right before he falls onto the rails and then dies at the hospital. Leo, who had not seen his son for years, will discover that he was involved in a bloody heist. While on the trail of his son’s murderers, Leo will be closely watched by the police, also investigating. They will soon discover that Leo’s skills in tracking and apprehending violent criminals are not those of a mere metro driver.
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
威廉·达福将加盟朱利安·施纳贝尔([潜水钟与蝴蝶])执导的新片[在永恒的门口](At Eternity’s Gate，暂译)。达福将在片中出演文森特·梵高。电影将聚焦梵高在法国阿尔勒与瓦兹河畔奥维尔度过的时光，重点讲述艺术家的创造力和为创作做出了怎样的牺牲。该片将在法国当地取景拍摄。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
方生方死，方死方生。人届中年的指挥家汤姆，在两端之间进退维谷。即将举行的演奏会诸事不顺，忙得不可开交之际，老父失智症恶化，老母癌病缠身，恐不久于人世。前度女友临盆，他亲自迎接新生命到临，更充当代理父亲。妹妹爱上同样酗酒的有妇之夫，生活一塌胡涂，更把他的音乐会弄垮。长期抑郁的作曲家决意寻死，他不得不为好友善后。一次又一次与死亡邂逅，指挥家终达致《垂死》交响曲的圆成，导演格斯纳也为亡故家人献上一阕动人挽歌。柏林影展最佳编剧。
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
本片取材于真人真事。故事讲述被判死刑的男主人公弗朗西斯(弗朗索瓦·莱特瑞尔 François Leterrier饰)在临刑前的几个小时内，如何成功越狱地扣人心弦的故事。为逃脱纳粹监狱，弗朗西斯策划了一场天衣无缝的逃亡计划。为确保计划万无一失，他不仅做足越狱准备，还在仅有的洗漱空挡，多次跟隔壁囚室的狱友联络，试图找到共同实施计划的同盟。可还没来得及他准备好一切时，就被判立刻执行死刑。最终他毅然带着年轻的囚犯男孩一起踏上了逃亡之路。 极简的叙事结构，单一密闭的监狱空间，分秒必争的紧迫时间，罗伯特·布列松因本片荣获第10届戛纳电影节(1957)最佳导演奖。
推荐理由同属短片类型，内容风格接近
Inspired by writer Sunita Balsara's experience with tinnitus, Ostinato follows Nuha, a composer who sees the world as a vibrant soundscape. She is having the best and gentlest kind of morning when her playing is interrupted by a mysterious Tone. As she struggles to confine and banish it, the Tone grows larger and louder, drowning out her music. Only when Nuha stops fighting does she discover a way to incorporate the Tone into her music and life.
推荐理由内容主题与本作较为接近
经营着一家五金店的亚当（亚历克·鲍德温 Alec Baldwin 饰）与芭芭拉（吉娜·戴维斯 Geena Davis 饰）夫妻俩非常恩爱，两人虽然没有孩子，但把所有对彼此的爱都倾注在装扮自己的家上。这天夫妻俩出行时发生车祸，双双殒命。成为鬼魂的两夫妻不忍离开自己的家，但阴阳相隔他们只能眼睁睁看的自己的家中搬来了新主人。入住的迪兹与查尔斯一家将夫妻俩的房子大肆改造，亚当和芭芭拉想出闹鬼招数试图吓走迪兹一家却不起作用，反被迪兹喜爱呆在黑暗中的怪异女儿莉迪亚（薇诺娜·瑞德 Winona Ryder 饰）看破，做鬼也难得尊严。无计可施的夫妻俩按照亡灵手册指引，拜托流离于阴间主流之外的大法师“甲壳虫汁”（迈克尔·基顿 Michael Keaton 饰）帮助他们夺回自己的家……
推荐理由同属短片类型，内容风格接近
Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts. These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves. Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished. Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives. Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production. The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation. Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety. The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning. This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them. The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued... Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."� Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations. Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality. On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time. Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom. Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive. Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language. Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever. The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns. What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality. Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations. Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep. Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world. Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past. Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end. Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it. Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept? Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything. Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time. Voice 1: Really hard to drink more. Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot. Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed. Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need. The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life. To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point? Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories. 1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.