类似《短暂的偷情纪实》的电影推荐
基于相似度算法为您推荐相关电影
我们通过分析电影的类型、导演、演员、评分和年代等多个维度,为您推荐以下相似电影。每部电影都附有具体的推荐理由,帮助您更好地了解为什么这部电影可能符合您的口味。
相似电影推荐
所言所行
在法国乡间度假期间,已怀孕三个月的德芬要独自接待男朋友弗朗索瓦的表弟麦森,因为弗朗索瓦的同事生病,他要赶回巴黎代班。在等待他回来的四天中,德芬和麦森逐渐熟络起来并开始互相分享一些非常私密的故事,二人亦因此愈来愈亲近……
情事
通过对两位主人公的访谈展开一段不寻常的爱情故事。 他(Sergi López 塞吉•洛佩兹 饰)和她(Nathalie Baye 纳塔莉•贝伊 饰)通过色情杂志的广告相识,两人彼此不知对方身世、姓名,却一见钟情,简单寒暄过后便投入纯粹的性爱之中。激情过后友好分手,约定下次见面时间,默契地保持着生活上的距离,心灵则渐渐拉近。激情难免归于平淡,半年的时间,他和她于性爱之外总要经历情感波动。偶然一位老人猝死二人面前,令他们开始审视这段由性而起的爱情…… 本片荣获第56届威尼斯电影节最佳男主角、最佳女主角奖。
偷心
四个男女之间的反复关系,在爱情里追逐和厌倦。丹(裘德·洛 Jude Law 饰)是作家,他爱上了舞女爱丽丝(娜塔丽·波特曼 Natalie Portman 饰)。丹对爱丽丝炽热燃烧的爱情给了他灵感和激情,但厌倦也随之而来,他内心在寻找另一个人的爱,终于他遇上了摄影师安娜 (朱莉娅·罗伯茨 Julia Roberts 饰)。 安娜和另一个年轻人拉里(克里夫·欧文 Clive Owen饰),在爱的游戏里相互试探和接近。但是丹的进攻也让她动了情。讽刺的是,安娜的情人拉里,也和爱丽丝有了瓜葛。 于是,躺在他们身边的人,未必是他们心里想念的那人。
婚前性行为
安德森(Henrik Norberg 饰)生性风流爱玩,是个不安分的年轻人,然而,如今,这位花花公子也要步入婚礼的殿堂,承担起做丈夫的责任了,而他将要迎娶的,是自己上司的女儿,这段婚姻无疑会为他的前程锦上添花。 作为安德森的死党,马特(Dan Malmer 饰)等人决定在新婚前夜为安德森举办一场盛大的单身告别派对,派对上,众人嗨翻全场,闹了整整一休,可是,当安德森从宿醉和头痛中醒来之时,却发现自己赤身裸体的躺在电梯间里,满脑子的疑问:昨晚究竟发生了什么?如今身在何处?自己的衣服又被谁脱下,藏到到哪里去了?更糟糕的是,安德森发现自己的婚礼将在两个小时之后如期举行。
偷情小心
雪琍继承父亲产业-牧场,壮飛帮雪琍管理牧场多年而雪琍一心一意想把牧场卖掉。国雄对妻子平珍代表公司前往观察顺便二度蜜月,曾对国雄有过一夜情的天爱同时也到牧场度假:平珍在晨跑时遇见壮飛,壮飛趁机接近身穿性感运动服的平珍,二人在马芳展开激情战火,欲倒致霉琍醋意大发,而国雄对天爱也难忍心中的怒火:因此,一场错综复杂的偷情戏码在牧场展开…………
一夜迷情
迈克(萨姆·沃辛顿 Sam Worthington 饰)和乔安娜(凯拉·耐特丽 Keira Knightley 饰)是一对令人羡慕的年轻夫妻,迈克拥有安稳工作、乔安娜是自由作家,二人居于曼克顿的时尚住宅,生活无忧。两人出席迈克的工作派时,乔安娜发现新来的女同事罗拉(伊娃·门德斯 Eva Mendes 饰)对丈夫态度暧昧,心情不佳,而迈克对妻子反应亦不以为然。没过多久,迈克和罗拉一起去外地出差,同时心神不安的乔安娜则在曼哈顿街头巧遇了曾经深爱过的旧情人艾力克斯(吉约姆·卡内 Guillaume Canet 饰)。 在这一夜,迈克能够抵抗住美丽罗拉诱惑?乔安娜又会不会和艾力克斯旧情复燃?精神外遇或肉体外遇,哪一种出轨方式对婚姻杀伤力最大?这一对伴侣是否可以回到原来平静的生活?
短信情缘
布雷斯林(詹森·刘易斯 Jason Lewis 饰)是一名金融理财顾问,在商场上非常成功,深受客户和老板的信赖。同样的,布雷斯林的私人感情生活也是丰富多彩,在他的手机里,存有数不清的电话号码,在这些电话号码的那端,是一个个可供他打发无聊夜晚的曼妙女子。 西蒙娜(卡莉·波普 Carly Pope 饰)和布雷斯林有着相同的生活方式。一场意外中,布雷斯林和西蒙娜邂逅了,随着时间的推移,两人都对对方产生了不一样的感觉,最终,他们决定开始一段两人都未曾尝试的新的关系,但是在此之前,他们各自的藏满了秘密的手机必须被处理。
流浪爱侣
在一片灰色的天空下,一个青少年罪犯中心收押了8个野性的问题青年。在这个封闭的世界里,他们相互吸引、相互对抗、相互挑衅--这群有暴力性需求的野猫青年建立了自己的法治。他们丝毫不怜惜新来的人,野蛮地使其服从自己的统治。宿舍、锅炉房、车间都是对这个脆弱新人的惩罚场所,嫉妒、紧张和欲望随着他的到来而爆发。一只年轻小独狼带着同伙,将这位年轻的受害者纳入他的保护范围,结束了这场恐怖游戏。但是,大人们在这场灭顶之灾中又扮演了什么角色?在《流浪爱侣》中,卡迪诺成功地对围绕青少年的性问题与社会道德中进行了艰难的研究,并将以他的作品作为旗帜高高举起。
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts. These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves. Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished. Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives. Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production. The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation. Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety. The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning. This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them. The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued... Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."� Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations. Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality. On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time. Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom. Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive. Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language. Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever. The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns. What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality. Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations. Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep. Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world. Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past. Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end. Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it. Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept? Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything. Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time. Voice 1: Really hard to drink more. Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot. Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed. Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need. The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life. To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point? Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories. 1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
偷吻
李泽街(冯德伦 饰)是一位大学新鲜人,新的校园,新的同学,李泽街的未来似乎在闪闪发光。李泽街有一个交往了七年的青梅竹马吴淑德(张绮桐 饰),但由于后者生性老实保守,两人直到今日还未曾有过肌肤之亲,这令血气方刚的李泽街感到十分郁闷,对待淑德的态度也日益冷淡。 在学校里,李泽街结识了名为梁爱诗(吴文忻 饰)的美丽少女,爱诗热情又奔放,很快,李泽街便与其打得火热,两人陷入爱欲的漩涡中无法自拔。没过多久,李泽街脚踏两只船的事迹便被爱诗和淑德识破了,愤怒的爱诗提出了分手,淑德亦与李泽街渐行渐远。之后,李泽街偶遇了性感美艳的美女老师索菲亚(钟丽缇 饰),一段全新的关系就此展开。
窃遇偷香
非常文艺的一部西班牙电影。静下心来看完后一定会有些沉思的,会有些伤感。年轻的Juan José Ballesta扮演的男主角相当的到位,有些执着、害羞以及对未来的一点点憧憬。母亲的堕落缴熄了他最后的希望以及动力。非常喜欢他与女主角最后分手的那一笑。个人觉得Juan非常像好莱乌的才子Edward Burns,不知道大家认同不?
窃欲无罪
丹尼尔(丹尼尔·奥图 Daniel Auteuil 饰)是一名畅销书作家,他以笔名创作,没有一个读者知道他隐匿在笔名之后的真实身份。,丹尼尔的儿子即将结婚,婚礼将在意大利卡布里岛举行,在那里,丹尼尔结识了美艳的女子米拉(安娜·莫格拉莉丝 Anna Mouglalis 饰),在后者的不断诱惑下,丹尼尔忘却了身为人夫的责任和道德,两人一夜温存。 回家后的丹尼尔内心久久不能平静,因为他发现米拉不是别人,正是儿子的新婚妻子,接连而来的威胁信也让丹尼尔不知该何去何从。与此同时,工作上的意外导致丹尼尔必须向读者公开自己的身份,但这些打击接二连三的到来时,谁会是最终的幕后黑手呢?